Government Welfare

Obviously not, Welfare, at the government level, is mainly monies given to promote the basic physical and material eudaemonia of people in emergency. This would include survivor benefits given to the widow/widowers of service-members. I dont feel all areas of welfare should be abolished for instance the WIC course of study which provides vouchers to low income mothers to assist in buying formula and healthy foods in which would not be possible without the program.The price of baby formula can be very expensive in which millions of children would suffer from hunger, unhealthy diets and other health problems in regards to nutritional factors. Sometimes, its just a matter of helping someone whos scratch off on their luck for a short time, and then there are cases where youve got an elderly person who is all only when and needs some assistance. However, corporate welfare should be abolished, and regular welfare should be better managed. Anyone who is on welfare should be required to exit or go to school 40 hours a week to get their check welfare should be a hand up, not a hand out.I think some people definitely need help. Sometimes, its just a matter of helping someone whos down on their luck for a short time, and then theres cases where youve got an elderly person who is all alone and needs some assistance. However, corporate welfare should be abolished, and regular welfare should be better managed. Anyone who is on welfare should be required to work or go to school 40 hours a week to get their check welfare should be a hand up, not a hand out.The governance is so bloated and unmanageable that it allows many people to abuse it. Abolishing welfare would truly be one of the most unthinkable things to do to our fellow men and women not to mention the children involved who werent quite as Lucky as many of us put on been in life. The Family Support Act, Americas most recent struggle at welfare reform, begins to take effect this year. The new law seeks to get s ingle mothers off welfare through a combination of job training, work requirements, child care subsidies, and child support enforcement.Cutting the welfare rolls is, in turn, supposed to save the taxpayer money while enhancing the self-respect of single mothers and their children. ( http//prospect. org/article/real-welfare-problem) Some Democrats consider the 1996 welfare reform is better than the recommendations of the Obama Administration. The House voted Thursday (September 20, 2012) to block the Obama Administrations unilateral weakening of welfares work requirements, and political reporters are writing it off as a partisan primal scream if they notice at all. (Unknown, 2012)All Republicans and nineteen Democrats showed their dislike of the current administrations path down the welfare reform road with an astounding 250-164 beat over welfare reform recommendations. Thats one-tenth of the Democratic caucus joining with the Republicans to say our people need welfare in its curren t severalize during these hard economic times. The Reform Act was started during the Clinton Administration in August of 1996. However, welfare has been a controversial issue since the 1960s.It was not until the late 1980s, when the citizens were concerned and communicate for some kind of reform to the welfare system. I do think that over the years there have been many changes to welfare programs. Many of these changes have been good, although some have been bad. The current welfare program will not see any beneficial changes until someone offers a more beneficial modal value of doing things. Unfortunately there have been very few ideas to change the welfare system. Hopefully in the future this changes.